On the prospect of writing cinema history from below
Tijdschrift voor Mediageschiedenis , Volume 9 - Issue 2 p. 74- 96
Beginning with a consideration of recent discussions on the state of film history this essay explores some aspects of the relationship between the historiography of cinema and broader currents of contemporary historiography including the poststructuralist critique of history as a realist fiction. It engages with what Colin MacCabe has recently called 'the weaknesses and insularity' of contemporary film studies by advocating the development of histories of cinema that place audiences rather than films at their centre and integrate the quantitative methods of social history with the concrete and particular conditions of experience that are the predominant concern of micro-history.
|Netherlands Institute for Sound and Vision|
|Tijdschrift voor Mediageschiedenis|
|Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).|
|TMG Journal for Media History; Vol 9, No 2 (2006): Cinema in context; 74-96|
Maltby, Richard. (2006). On the prospect of writing cinema history from below. Tijdschrift voor Mediageschiedenis, 9(2), 74–96. doi:10.18146/tmg.550